Interesting research from Oz

Discussion in 'General Discussions' started by Rick Burten, Sep 12, 2012.

  1. Offline

    Rick Burten Professional farrier

    Likes Received:
    82
    Trophy Points:
    28
  2. Offline

    Mr. Perry Active Member

    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    43
  3. Offline

    Tom Bloomer Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    63
    So a range of over 10% variation is considered "fairly constant?" :rolleyes:o_O
  4. Offline

    Mr. Perry Active Member

    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    43
    "10% of what"? A "foot changes to enviroment" or "the horn of the foot" changes 10%?... Both studies are about "horn" not the entire foot........ A rolled eyes and sqeewwh is not a learned and proffesional answer.......
  5. Offline

    Tom Bloomer Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    63
    The 10% range of variation has to do with the reported Standard Deviation +/- 5.1% , +/-5.8%, and +/-2.9%

    It is one study "Effect of Environmental Conditions on Degree of Hoof Wall Hydration in Horses" reported in two articles.
  6. Offline

    DeniseMc Member

    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    18
  7. Offline

    Mr. Perry Active Member

    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    43
    will have to read entire placard to make an empirical opine..... in the morning w/ coffee
  8. Offline

    Mr. Perry Active Member

    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    43

    hoof wall, glad you re-read. An average of 4+-%. Duh, piss and stand in it for 5 minutes Bloomer. epitheials will absorb+-95% is intack.....really.
  9. Offline

    DeniseMc Member

    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    18
    it would certainly explain the range of variation
  10. Offline

    Mr. Perry Active Member

    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    43
    a 4% average range?
  11. Offline

    Tom Bloomer Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Horn behaves very much like wood when it comes to mechanical properties and moisture content.
  12. Offline

    Tom Bloomer Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    63
    No stupid I got it right the first time.
  13. Offline

    DeniseMc Member

    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    18
    But what about permability?

    http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-312012.html

  14. Offline

    Mr. Perry Active Member

    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    43

    Never called ya "Stupid; this is the exception. But you didn't average with presented abstracts/studies....a good researcher takes all figuges as total and then averages to accumalate a reasonable outcome. Thus, our accumalative experiences may
    "play a part in the interpetation(s)".... As I say about hoof conditioning, " Oil goes into you car lady".....
  15. Offline

    Tom Bloomer Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    63
    LOL! Which species? Which direction? Which horse?


    Not to stray from the thread too far with my analogy - there is a lot more published data on the mechanical properties of wood at various moisture levels, but you have to pick a species.
    http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/research/centers/woodanatomy/

    In a more general sense, wet horn is soft, dry horn is hard. The same is true of wood.

    Some individual domestic horses seem to be more susceptible to high moisture environments and large changes in environmental moisture than other individuals. The same is true of various wood species.

    In a study of feral horses, where would one find living specimens with moisture susceptible horn?
  16. Offline

    David Van Hook Member

    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    8
    My question is why do they keep doing these studies on dead feet? I've never seen any dead tissue that acts/reacts the same way to stimuli as it would have while living. Has anyone seen any research showing that hoof tissues do? I sure haven't been able to find any.
  17. Offline

    Tom Bloomer Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    63
    David, I think the study was done on live horses, but my point is that bad footed feral horses don't live long enough to reproduce. So the samples taken should not be compared to domestic horses that are the product of human selective breeding and coddling vs. survival of the fittest.
  18. Offline

    David Van Hook Member

    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Tom,

    The abstract says that the the soaking portion was done on live horses. However, the part of the study using feral horses used"...hoof wall samples from routine feral horse-culling operations in New Zealand and Australia..." to me that says hooves cut from dead horses.

    That's why I asked about all these studies using dead hooves.

    To your point, I completely agree. Domestic animals are completely different than animals who are subject to the natural, survival of the fittest, laws.

    David
  19. Offline

    Tom Bloomer Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    63
    To my recollection (not for sure on this) of Dr. Chris Pollitt's story from a lecture I attended few years ago they cull the herds by shooting "in the bush" with high powered rifles as opposed to rounding them up. It would make logical sense if they took measurements of the samples immediately following lights out. But since the article says the measurements were taken "in vitro" who knows how much time elapsed before they got them to "the lab."

    What I can tell you of my own experience with fresh cadaver limbs - they dry out very quickly once they no longer have a pulse. "Fresh" means taken immediately after a horse is euthanized as opposed to picking them up from a rendering plant after they have "seasoned" for a day or two.
  20. Offline

    Mr. Perry Active Member

    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Deal with the "Fresh" of what is presented each day. Give counsel and move onto the next project. If counsel is not "heeded". "How does the world tune an adult? through their pocket books." Therefore a parlay of factiods of N vs. D is a futile discussion...........

Share This Page

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)